Chapter 1. What are threads? Why use them?
Chapter 1. What are threads? Why use them?
In this chapter:
History.
Definitions.
An Example.
Why use threads?
History.
In the early days of computing, all programming was essentially single
threaded. You created your program by punching holes into cards or tape,
submitted your deck of cards to the local computing centre, and after a
few days, you received another deck of cards, containing, if you were lucky,
the required results. All processing was batch, non time critical, first
come first served, and when your program was running, it has exclusive
use of the computer's time.
Things have moved on. The concept of multiple threads of execution first
appeared with time sharing systems, where more than one person could be
logged into a central mainframe computer at once. It was important to ensure
that the processing time of the machine was fairly divided between all
users, and the operating systems of the time made use of the "process"
and "thread" concepts. Desktop computers have seen a similar progression.
Early DOS and Windows systems were single tasking. Your program ran exclusively
on the machine, or not at all. With increasingly sophisticated applications,
and increasing demands on personal computers, especially with respect to
high performance in the graphics and networking areas, multiprocess and
multithread operating systems are now commonplace. Multithreading on PC's
has mainly been driven by the need for better performance and usability
Definitions.
The first concept to define is that of the process. Most Windows
95, 98 and NT users have a good intuitive idea of what a process is. They
see it as a program which runs on the machine, co-existing and sharing
CPU, disk and memory resources with other programs. Programmers know a
process to be an invocation of executable code, such that that code has
a unique existence, and the instructions executed by that process are executed
in an ordered manner. On the whole, processes execute in isolation. The
resources they use (memory, disk, I/O, CPU time) are virtualised, such
that every process has its own set of virtual resources, untouched by other
processes. The operating system provides this virtualisation. Processes
execute modules of code. These may be disjoint; in the sense that,
the executable modules of code comprising Windows Explorer and Microsoft
Word are disjoint. However, they may also be shared, as in the case of
DLL's, the code for which is typically being executed in the context of
many different processes, often simultaneously. The execution speed or
ordering of processes is normally independent of one another: Microsoft
word does not stop opening a document just because the print spooler is
currently sending something to the printer!
Our next concept is that of the thread. Threads were developed
when it became clear that it was desirable to have applications which performed
several sets of actions in a more loosely time ordered fashion, possibly
performing several sets of actions at once. In situations where some actions
would cause a considerable delay in one thread of execution (e.g.. waiting
for the user to do something), it was often desirable to have the program
still perform other actions concurrently (e.g. background spell checking,
or processing incoming network messages). However, the overhead of creating
a whole new process for each new thread of execution, and then having the
processes communicate was often far too much of an overhead.
An Example.
If one needs to look for a good example of multithreading, then Windows
Explorer (i.e. the Windows Shell) is an excellent example. Double click
on "My Computer", and click through a few sub folders, spawning new windows
as you go. Now invoke a lengthy copy operation on one of those windows.
The progress bar pops up, and that particular window does not respond to
user input. However, all the other windows are perfectly usable. Obviously,
several things are going on at once, but only one copy of explorer.exe
is running. This is the essence of multithreading.
Why use threads?
Threads do not alter the semantics of a program. They simply change the
timing of operations. As a result, they are almost always used as an elegant
solution to performance related problems. Here are some examples of situations
where you might use threads:
Doing lengthy processing: When a windows application is calculating it
cannot process any more messages. As a result, the delay cannot be updated.
Doing background processing: Some tasks may be non time critical, but need
to execute continuously.
Doing I/O work: I/O to disk or to network can have unpredictable delays.
Threads allow you to ensure that I/O latency does not delay unrelated parts
of your application.
All of these examples have one thing in common: In the program, some operations
incur a potentially large delay or CPU hogging, but this delay or CPU usage
is unacceptable for other operations; they need to be serviced now.
Of course there are other miscellaneous benefits, and here they are:
Making use of multiprocessor systems: You can't expect one application
with only one thread to make use of two or more processors!
Efficient time sharing: Using thread and process priorities, you can ensure
that everyone gets a fair allocation of CPU time.
The wise use of threads turns slow, clunky, not very responsive programs
into crisply responsive, efficient, fast programs, and can radically simplify
various performance and usability problems.
[Contents] [Next]
© Martin Harvey
2000.
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
ch1 (15)ch1 (2)ch1 ind5ch1 ind7ch1 (4)ch1 ind80472113038 ch1Cisco2 ch1 Vocabch1 ind9CH1 Nieznanych1 ind7ch1ch1 in14SKO2 ch1 v2 0 p2wishcraft ch1ch1 i11ach1 in12więcej podobnych podstron