00145 bd64c30a9510b5eb82a95c582420bd

Simpson & Keats

nonlinear optimization techniąue is a good candidate approach sińce it has been successful (see, for example, Saniga 1989 and Del Castillo et al. 1994) in solving problems of this type. A morę detailed description of tłiis techniąue can be found in Luenberger (1989) or Reklaitis et al. (1983).

Similar to the economic statistical designs, the trade-off approach was developed to address the concems mentioned in the introduction about economic designs. By focusing on designs with improved in-control and out-of-control run length performance, false alarm rates can be reduced and the ability to ąuickly detect shifts can be increased. lmproved statistical performance with focus on achieving the largest improvement in the region of minimum cost is also consistent with Deming's philosophy of tight process Controls. The charts presented in the examples enable designers to ąuickly understand the financial impacts of ARL improvements.

The trade-off approach provides the analyst or engineer with a view of a portion of the cost surface that may not be available under the constrained statistical economic approach. The constrained approach is certainly valid if the constraints are reąuired for a specific reason. It is possible though, that in many instances the control chart designer may not be able to define firm statistical constraints needed to successfiilly monitor and detect process assignable causes. The primary advantage of the trade-off approach over other economical statistical approaches is that it focuses the attention on the design altematives in the immediate vicinity of the minimum cost. It takes some of the guess work out of constraint formulation. Instead of arriving at a single best constrained design, the analyst can prepare several options with slightly different benefits, so that the decision maker can select the best choice for the organization.

Shewhart Chart vs. CUSUM in the LV Model

Statistical process control experts do not generally regard the X and CUSUM charts as competitors, but rather as complementary techniąues for solving a rangę of problems. The X detects larger shifts in the process mean versus the CUSUM which handles smaller shifts better. Rather than comparing these two charts on the basis of statistical performance, we propose a comparison in terms of cost of implementation. Statistical or ARL comparisons are often used to indicate the strengths of certain procedures under different process shift scenarios. Table 10 compares ARL values for the X and CUSUM charts with sample sizes of 1, 3 and 5.

Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00121 ge08f5e71e20195f362e2605eea9911 122 Simpson & Keats by a trade-off analysis in the region
00123 ?c7966411ba3b5a68b0b64b1a493604 124 Simpson & Keats parameters may in some cases be diffi
00125 ?550c009f0c2a895872fcea22e14617 126 Simpson & Keats Yj T s k c the CUSUM value (xj - T)/s
00127 ?dfcc3570d2bc1727128e91fc004125 128 Simpson & Keats Table 1. Explanation of Model Terms S
00129 ?0dc7dd15a3eed19df820989269d0be 130 Simpson & Keats were expected cost per time unit, CUS
00131 48ab01b0a51c522dda8ce0feb6c2dd 132 Simpson & Keats significantly drive the cost response
00135 ?0b8328312d99bc5a1f6952b3660550 136 Simpson & Keats Table 6. Example 1 Using Smali and La
00137 ?f8c690b843523daa85e27205605cc9 138 Simpson & Keats Table 7. Results of Yerification Test
00141 ?810fbac779efca768189e25cde7df8 142 Simpson & Keats Figures 2 and 3 present the same type
00147 48eb0997542476033b79821e165047 14$ Simpson & Keats that minimizes expected hourly cost.
00149 X58e44d67a8fa64ce25678ae9975d0f 150 Simpson & Keats Table 12. Shewhart and CUSUM Control
00151 ?ac5d664405d180127a449f8d3c8023 152 Simpson & Keats values of the ARLs. Table 15 shows th
00155 ?201ca32f381f34fdf319cbd394dfa2 156 Simpson & Keats Barnard, G. A., (1959) "Control
00157 ?aedd7cd4026aabb7ac11fe0418cad1 158 Simpson & Keats Page, E. S., (1954) “Continuous Inspe
1.    J. M. Borwein, A.S. Lewis, Convex analysis and nonlinear optimization, Springer
s7(1) 146 LIBERALIZM czyli kooperacja. Niekooperatywne techniki zakładały monitorowanie poziomu uzbr
00143 ?292850a8efe3a6fbe4c3a2b1090591 144 Simpson & Keats 1 10 100 1000 ARL (log scal*) Figurę
00474 ]a51e5c1353c56ad2b9b966aec639f9 480 Del Castillo needed for the optimization model is too dif

więcej podobnych podstron