00146 &5dd89e4c9f1d1c9b9ade934fbf44bb

00146 &5dd89e4c9f1d1c9b9ade934fbf44bb



147


Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis

Table 10. Comparison of X and CUSUM Control Chart ARLs

Shift

N=f

CUSUM Shewhart

--

CUSUM Shewhart

--

CUSUM Shewhrr>

P

3me

370

3X4

370

0.25

124.4

281.2

47.0

184.3

2C>.

133.2

0.5

36.4

155.2

12P

60.7

8.4

33.4

0.75

16.3

81.2

6.7

225

4.8

10.8

1

10.0

43.9

4.6

9.8

3.4

4.5

1.25

7.1

25.0

3.5

5.0

2.7

2.4

1.5

5.5

15.0

2.9

2.9

2.2

1.6

1.75

4.5

9.5

2.5

2.0

2.0

1.2

2

3.9

6.3

2.2

1.5

1.8

1.1

2.25

3.4

4.4

2.0

1.2

1.6

1.0

2.5

3.0

3.2

1.9

1 1

1.4

1.0

Conlrol Chart Design ParametBrs

Decision Int Rei Value

CUSUM 4.788*    0.50

Shev\hart 3.00

♦Selected so that the in-control CUSUM ARL matched the in-control Shewhart 3 sigma ARL.

The design parameters used to compare each procedurę (L = 3 for the X chart; and h = 4.788, k = 0.5 for the CUSUM) are within the rangę of values commonly found in industry. The decision interval value of 4.788 was selected so that the resulting CUSUM chart ARL1 would be close to the X chart ARL1 for L = 3. As such, valid comparisons can be madę between the two control charts design average run lengths for different levels of process shift. For the individuals' case (n = 1), the CUSUM control chart outperforms the X chart in all ARL2 cases. As the sample size increases, the X outperforms the CUSUM for large shifts. The obvious ąuestion that follows is: which chart is morę economical for monitoring a process when sample sizes are allowed to vary and all the process cost penalties are considered. Another approach is reąuired to answer this ąuestion.

We developed a program to determine optimal cost designs for the two control chart procedures. The program performs a search on the control chart design parameters, the sample size and the sampling interval to find the optimal combination of values that minimize hourly cost. The design parameters include the control interval width (L) for the X chart, and the decision interval (H) and reference value (k) for the CUSUM chart. As in the earlier studies, the optimization routine contains a grid search on the design parameters and sample size, and a Golden section search on sampling interval


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00149 X58e44d67a8fa64ce25678ae9975d0f 150 Simpson & Keats Table 12. Shewhart and CUSUM Control
00134 ?0fccfa985e4cfd668b181d101a42da 135 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis Table 5. Example 1
00152 ?cb17ca464b8901288e6dd4f0513e8d 153 Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis Table 14. Cost Comp
00128 ?541c295e5c443a126cf2c578c908b3 129 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis is to determine the
12vel07 [ic:Analysis]The difficult part of framed option Controls is placing the option buttons insi
286 TABLE 10 Verification of the mathematical model based on some random data consist of different t
00122 ?2a2af26c89838d7ded5308219209c7 123 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis all design decision
00124 /6bd3286305d150da0dbc17ca8e15bc 125 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis We first apply the
00126 5d3cf0c11398defcf28efc93e20ee1 127 Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis varying shape param
00130 Ld811c783a010c7cfdfc60f3fb2ac01 131 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis were aliased with o
00136 ?b0b84f71f40695e8844499eae9e824 137 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis verification of the
00138 ?b34bfe1c47dc055c8d02cda05623df 139 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis conclusions concemi
00144 ?9ab8111d8fc663b9ebe1d48b8104eb 145 Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis Assumes fixed refer
00148 991d05155b3bacdce347c5884ffbbe 149 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis typical production
00150 D9acbde9d435381a2e9b8d77b152fd5 151 Optimization and Sensitmty Analysis account for over 90%
00156 ?7280a85750cd771225fd1fc4ecd9cf 157 Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis Goel, A. L., Jain,
00120 ?0ecfe9a1e4d8a862a9d866214e168e 8Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis with an Economic Model

więcej podobnych podstron