00200 ‰dd4c36466f230725aa367933239d12

Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger

FigurÄ™ 6. CUSUM Chart with K = 2ct for a Shift of 10 Units per Period at Observation 251, PMepc/spc = 3.23.

neither scheme signaled that an assignable cause has occurred. The performance measure for both schemes is 3.23 which is exactly that of the EPC scheme. This tends to indicate that applying CUSUM schemes to the correlated control actions might not improve the ability to determine that sustained shifts occurred in the process.

Simulation Results for Sustained Shifts

To further investigate the performance of this integrated EPC/SPC system for a sustained shift in the process, a simulation study was performed. The shift magnitudes investigated where 1, 2, 5, 7.5, and 10. In each study, a sustained shift of the appropriate magnitude was introduced in the process at observation 251 and is eliminated as soon as detected by the SPC rule. Performance measures are weighted due to the fact that only the number of observations after 251 to detect the sustained shift are included in the calculation. This weighted performance measure is used for each of the combined EPC/SPC schemes employed. For each scenario considered, the number of such simulations that did not signal are labeled with a star. The random variables e_t and a_t in equations (1) and (2) are assumed to be normally

Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00192 aa328750125e1243c8afa938aa44d2 194 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger procedurÄ™ develop
00194 1d8a74b4aab9144d5ec59c9eb7b0470 196 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger Montgomery, Keats
00196 ?c3e9ff6e1645b5c66f96f0e3b703fa 198 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger The residual for
00198 232d84ff9038548cd8ba3d622f949a 200 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger 1
00202 ?7cb32bd7d1b69f04eb4b4af0e6b1c0 204 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger schemes are highl
00206 s61d525289e95c98083ce52337cb095 208 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger 1
00208 ?1906ab0bcf2542dac76203983810dc 210 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger Table 4. Average
00210 ?246880ef8acb759604ec0c539ba3cf 212 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger EWMA and tracking
00212 &fa33dfb8674ece9b74b922ec382a36 214 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger Montgomery, D. C.
00204 0dd8ff3fe57aa8840e3bb1cf63aa6d9 206 Messina, Montgomery, Keats & Runger FigurÄ™ 8. Residua
00002 Wa1200dd52eaa9cb862dd2b730d8718 1IntroductionJ. Bert Keats and Douglas C. Montgomery Arizona
00003 ?e79c4d386fa66ff3c76b500aaac752 2 Keats & Montgomery problems. This topical grouping clos
00005 ?c83d1e05ebea51ca527b5a4071b83a 4 Keats & Montgomery integration of these two generał cla
00007 282c5a7fa7659c3a226b73b7e597d4b 6 Keats & Montgomery The fourth paper by EnriÄ…ue Del Cast
00123 ?c7966411ba3b5a68b0b64b1a493604 124 Simpson & Keats parameters may in some cases be diffi
00280 ?50e49716bf91ec4f5cc241ba142d24 282 Montgomery & Runger Statistica! Inference in tbe Rand
00282 ?2f085e03aac52a0e08de9cd1e42da1 284 Montgomery & Runger Source Expected Mean DAY Var (
00298 ?1791c3beed8e29507fe0ad183dab13 300 Montgomery & Runger Dependent Yariable: Y Iteration
00292 ?130a5515d538ae101ebed8fc2fb817 294 Montgomery & Runger Class Level Information Class

więcej podobnych podstron