00314 ñf49248905805fa4cf0d5be042fd4c1

00314 ñf49248905805fa4cf0d5be042fd4c1



317


Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors


FigurÄ™ 2. Equality Relationship for the Probability of a Defective Unit, xj, Being Measured by the Gage as a Good Unit

(3) is used. If a guard band is used, then the mean of the gage distribution becomes the guard band.

FigurÄ™ 3 shows the relationship of the probability of having a rangÄ™ of defective units, dx, and the associated probability of these defective units being accepted by the gage as good units. By integrating all of the probabilities of having reject units of product fali in dx ranges multiplied by their associated probabilities of being accepted from the specification limit to positive infinity, the defect level can be as follows:

(5)


P(good)reject) =    J [f(z)J g' (y)dy ]dz

USL i

Although the focus so far has been on the probability or risk of sending defective units to the customer or further along the assembly linÄ™, it would certainly be of interest to minimize the probability of throwing away a good unit. The probability of discarding a good unit, xj is:


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00316 ?09c0d2f3a2243d1d46b1f997b3d3cf 319 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors Figu
00312 ?50bbf6d416fbf0edb061aff9ba2fbc 315 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors fina
00318 Fc61831291a35229ea5e67ab507c8cf 321 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors Guar
00320 ?5cd1011755558fd005661a9b3cd8ed 323 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors Defe
00322 ?b73d4dcbb3956a7a53bceacac34fb9 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors 325 Figu
00324 ?4f0003b2ed2810dd76bb30abe464e6 327 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors goal
00326 A9b69718dd18cd338e0f0700b7c79c2 329 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors + f(
00328 ?80eb3e1366a39705d7b77d62f12780 331 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors ao P
00330 r8ad54f747f0f287dd69fb4ed228e35 333 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors The
00332 ?133d2464eb28601d2d991683b45647 335 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors on t
00334 ?b2793f238bc36b5f1c29c11f214359 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors 337 Resp
00336 ?e7e8dcfe0a23e46d4a41cf7d1feb53 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors 339 zao
00338 ?79650d4af41fcdcb3a1354afe938a8 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors 341 di =
00340 Vbfa1728c6ca8c65c355df31b8a4ed5 343 Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors Grub
00310 Ad65eb5323f68600e39f63d1a31de2f 16Optimizing Defect Levels and Losses from Gage Errors Daniel
[21J Oh K. S., and T. S. Kim: Performance analysis on various system layouts for the combination of
00315 ?2897da0df33ebfef7d49591ddf4696 318 McCarviIle & Montgomery FigurÄ™ 3. The Probabiiity of
00010 o37e5a207821673679142b905c2bbae 9 An Overview and Perspectiye on Control Charting As a backgr

więcej podobnych podstron