Lcta UN !\ ERSTTAT1 S WRAT1SLAV1ŁN SIS V> j%0 K9k AiefceotogtcziK XL Wrocłr* 2007
JSETA MAŁGORZATA KŁOSIŃSKA1
Tfccołlecti
mr*" ofarchaeological matenals coneeming the Lublin region.- dat-sta8es °f the Bronze Age and the esriy Iron Age. has been receotly *edh“k1*^ ^ “Pttfi^th extendeddue to reve*lmg matenalsuspab-^S wheno and itlflow of entireK- ne\\ fink ! Thereftw a nossibłhn arose
**** East Europę. Those links. difierent in tiroe and inteastiy. h> ^ flow of people and objects acccanpanying them Beyond
ł T^. of ^Aidacokjgy; MinaCw-Slk^""'' l nivcrst>. t»N*
1 of ihis K$k\n b ^’**■* s
7>In^iLpressntAis'-■«»rcfeste*rwa«' vvith neightyuńng ins* of ifac n$t«-*iec tntcanes-^'Iteteh**** »*
SvT ——"ne ti\CT Buc
««hnc«i m oten. •!'*» •*"■«* **’^
^ «***»•■■» «**■ <rf*'**
|F «o» łAjoas vmh fte LuWin ts^wo ssaw te Nr *»*•'
ISSUES OF THE EAST-’ AND CENTRAL-EUROPEAN CONTACTS >FTHE LUBLIN REGION IN THE YOUNGER BRONZE AGE AND THE EARLY IRON AGE i SI LIGHT OF EX1STING RESEARCH AND SOURCES
■V" •**» tiifiow of entirely new finds1 Tberefore a possibility wse t^ognition of the problem of cultural and settlement rełanon-^H^^temtory in the mentioned primaev.il periods. Evw today. the esisting r* l° ^st™=u*s^ *he issues of the conneetions betueen the Lublin ■. a£ Central and East Fimw tk.v^* iint< in tinte and inteastft.
tj/T*rc °hjects or raw materiał necessary in thetr ptodacticn abow afl tn°St ^Pttficanl elements of a pheoomenon. whieh in the sabjeet of >łt, ** t^hned as "kmg-distance trade exchange“ U sfcall aiso Nr a&fcd
BR 1. "ere elements of foreign provenance the most stgniticantly nam* ■jv ^haeological materiał.
I trjję structure of close or even long-distance links was not based e-nly *ho| '*aP°Ptdarundcistandingconsideredsimplcexch*ngeofgoodskbut ^tg-łerm neighbourhood and mutual penetraw* of socienes. In s*n