6926476408

6926476408



Comparison of the laying and egg weighl of laying... 17

age of hens

a. b - difference significam at P <0.05: A, B - diflerence significanf at P < 0.01.

FIGURĘ 3. Weekly lay ing production (%) of ISA Brown hens during experimental period. F/FC - hens kepi in fumished cage and transferred to comentional ones; C/CF - hens kept in furnished comentional cage and transferred to fumished ones


in hens moved from group F to group FC (Fig. 3). The statistical analysis of the entire period after cage shifting dem-onstrated significantly higher (P <0.01) laying performance in FC group com-pared to CF group. Also in the succes-sive weeks of the experiment the higher laying performance was observed in the hens from conventional cages - except for the 4th and 7,h week afler the change of cages (Fig. 1).

The laying performance of hens moved from group C to group CF de-creased significantly (P < 0.01) reaching the ma\imum value of barely 88.8% in week 50 of hens life and the minimal value of 81.3% in week 46 of hens life (Fig. 3). Undoubtedly the significant difference in the laying performance of hens after movement to a different type of cage was due to the number of birds hav-ing both direct and visual contact. Hens kept individually in groups C and FC had only visual contact with two neighboring hens, whereas layers kept in group cages (F and FC) had a direct contact with 9 hens housed in the same cage and visu-al contact with 20 hens from neighboring cages. It may be speculated that the rapid decrease in laying performance directly after hens transfer from C to CF result-ed from a hierarchy being established in a group of hens that have so far been kept individually (Fig. 3). Already after 4 weeks the performance retumed to the level determined before cage change. The mean egg production in this period was lower by 3.8% (P < 0.01) compared to the first stage of the study (Table 2). In contrast, hens moved to cages with



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00152 ?cb17ca464b8901288e6dd4f0513e8d 153 Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis Table 14. Cost Comp
When comparing and contrasting the similarities and differences between bridges and switches, which
P270109 06[01] 3. Compare the points of view of the 1st and 2nd part of the text. Consider: a) &nbs
kolibry w malwach (1) SORT YOUR COLORS Identify your colors by comparing them in daylight and checki
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOBUTYL ETHER 243 of the Msp I-digested DNA fragments was comparable in both contr
120 Bunc V. J. Heller, S. Sprynarova, R. Zdanowicz. Comparison of the anaerobic threshold and mechan
Comparison of no. of infections per 1000 inhabitants in 4 countries nearthe same latitude and using
StepperCompare COMPARISON OF THE 74194 - UNIPOLAR AND BIPOLAR STEP GENERATOR CONFIGURATIONS ©2003 RO
The above calculations (see Tables 19 - 22) and the subsequent comparison of the ranking of threats&
174 Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., et Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual beh
174 Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., et Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual beh
Abstract Comparison of security in GSM and UMTS systems The scope of my work encompasses the analysi
1122 A. Kafsifis ct al. relaxation, tolerancc and dependence and is comparablc Jo the characteristic
120 Bunc V. J. Heller, S. Sprynarova, R. Zdanowicz. Comparison of the anaerobic threshold and mechan
APC 13 08 29 33 3 3d ♦The comparative of real, right and wrong is formed with morę and the
Hughes, Susanna Stephanie Revenge (SB) The beautiful and sensuous Stephanie is settling into her n

więcej podobnych podstron