4053062879

CHAPTER 3. THE SHORT PENTECOST LECTIONARY

BO BOAtA EOttMtA 1€CTZ 0 ^pMCTT MCOVfCT BZ BACZ. 19 AOVf^Z AA NG OVfrAWAMTG.³²⁷20 npOpOHBCTBMrA NG OVftCAprAMTG. 21 BbCtA ttC- MOCOVJUJAMTG AOBpO^CZBpBlUAMTG.³²⁸ 22 OTZ BBCrAKOrO BMATNMtA³²⁹ Z,ZAA OPpTE&MTG CA. 23 CAMZ AG BOrZ MMpA AA CBATMTZ³³⁰ BKI OTZN^AB.³³¹ M BBCG CZBpBLUGNZ BAMZ A0XftZ. H A0VfWA M TTA O NGnOpOHBNO BZ npMUJbCTBMM rOCnOAA NALUGrO MC0V[CZ ^pMCTA AA CZBAK)A€TZ CA.³³²

Sunday of Week 32 after Pentecost

lTim. 4 9-15 (MSS: SBJPQRHKMTTf P30 F A L W)

4 9 BTpbNO CAOBO M BbCfAKOMOVf npMlATMK) AOCTOMNO. 10 BZ CG³³³ BO³³⁴ TpOVfAAAłGMZ CA. H nONOLUGNHl€ npMl€MAK-MZ. tAKO 0VfnZBA^0MZ NA EOrA AMBA. MAG KCTZ CZriACMTGAb BbCTMZ HAOBTKOMZ. flAHG AG BTpbNblMLIZ. 11 ZAnpTUUAM CM M 0VfHM. 12 NM KZTO AG O ŁONOCTM TBOKM AA NG NGpOAMTZ. NZ OBpAZ.Z EttAM BTpbNbIMMZ CAOBOMb. AMTMKMb. AK)EbBMI7f\. AO^OMb. BTpOtffi. HMCTOTOtfE. 13 AONbAO AG npMMA^. BZNMMAM³³⁵ HbTGNMK) OVfTBUJGNMK) OVfHGNMK>. 14 NG ATNM CA 0 CBOlGMb AApt MAG TM A&NZ EbICTZ³³⁶ flpOpOHbCTBOMb CZ BZ^AOAGNMKMb

K M. An intercsting set of variants, partly along well-known lines; the would-be archaising participle in Commented Texts and H is remarkable. K and M tend to affiliate with the Continuous. viz. the Commented Texts, as can be seen from the two preceding footnotes.

³²⁷ S P Q R M F A L W. ovfr&cw€ tz OBJHKTCTf P30. A surprisingly large pan of the tradition neglects the impcrative.

³²⁸ OBPRHKTCTf P30, ApAMTG F A. CAp^AMTe L, CAp*MTe W. (N27: ieax£X£T£) Cf. also on this passage: Bakker & Van der Tak & Veder, 1999.

³²⁹ SBJPRHKTLW, cb-ra^nma O. bmaa C Tf P30. oepA£A (£aa ov{Aaaamt€ cg) M. bmabtm Q; F and A om. whole verse 22. Slriking corruption in Q, and to a lesser extent in O.

³³⁰ S O B J R H K T C Tf P30, criAceT P Q, ocbatmt M F A L W. Again. M joins FALW in a lexical variation; P and Q go into the corruption. probably by misreading an abbreviation CT for cn with a horizontal stroke extended to the right.

³³¹ SOBJPQHKMTCTf P30, ao iconua FAL. CBptuenM o bccm W.

³³² S B P R T C Tf P30 L. EAOVfA€T O F A, OSACZAM J, CEAOVfA€T€ Q, CEOV|AeT H. ceaagt K, C^pANMT M W. ca om. J C Tf P30, P reads en, R nm. It is to be feared that the Greek xr|pri9eir) was not fully understood by all scribes, if noticed at all.

³³³ The exact words of the manuscripts are difficult to reproduce in this case. The scriptio continua in com-bination with an unclear distinction between the jers in most manuscripts makes it essentially impossible to distinguish between BZ ce, which would be a perfcct translation of eię touio. the undoubted Greek text here, and BbC€ (“all”: possible in S B Q P30), an incorrect reading, but which could have given rise to bzcm (J), perhaps even tocero pAAM bcm (L), taking also in account the subsequent yap.

³³⁴ h add. S B Q P30. (xai does not figurę in the text of N27, but is found in F G 1881 and 2K, see apparatus of N27). Here. the Byzantine text does not seem to have been used as the Greek Vorlage for at least part of the Slavic translation.

³³⁵ S B J P Q R H K M TTf P30 L, bngmam F A W.

³³⁶ S B J P Q R H T Tf P30, b tce-e aanmm tce-e KM,b tge-e aact th ca F A W. aact ca tcs-e L. A rarely observed case of syntactic variation in F A L W.